Headley v. Penn

75 A. 177, 79 N.J.L. 406, 50 Vroom 406, 1910 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 192
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJanuary 13, 1910
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 75 A. 177 (Headley v. Penn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Headley v. Penn, 75 A. 177, 79 N.J.L. 406, 50 Vroom 406, 1910 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 192 (N.J. 1910).

Opinion

The opinion of the court "was delivered by

Bergen, J.

The proceedings brought up by this writ must be set aside. Not only was the plaintiff entitled to notice of the day fixed for the trial of the right of the claimant to the goods, but the constable is bound to suspend any further proceedings looking to the trial of claimant’s right to the property when he is indemnified against the claim, and to proceed to sell as if no such claim had been made, and when, as in this case, it was made to appear to the justice of the peace that the indemnity had been given the constable, he had no jurisdiction to try claimant’s right.

The proceedings assailed will be set aside.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Allied Chemical & Dye Corp. v. Steel & Tube Co. of America
127 A. 414 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1925)
Hyde Park Lumber Co. v. Hunt
98 A. 907 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1916)
Christmas Gold Mining Co. v. Milliken
200 F. 316 (D. Colorado, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
75 A. 177, 79 N.J.L. 406, 50 Vroom 406, 1910 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/headley-v-penn-nj-1910.