Headley v. Obenchain

33 Tex. 682
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1871
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 33 Tex. 682 (Headley v. Obenchain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Headley v. Obenchain, 33 Tex. 682 (Tex. 1871).

Opinion

Ohden, J.

The only assignment of error in this cause is that the court below erred in overruling the exceptions of defendants to plaintiff’s petition. There was a general demurrer filed in the cause below, but the records show no action or ruling of the court on the same; and by repeated decisions of this court it has been held that when the record shows no ruling of the lower court on exceptions or demurrers, they will be considered as having been waived. (Chambers v. Miller, 9 Tex., 286 ; The State v. Thompson, 18 Tex., 527; Myers v. The State, 31 Texas, 178.)

We are, however, of the opinion that if the court did overrule the demurrer, still there was no error. The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Martin v. Smith
7 S.W.2d 114 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1928)
Luginbyhl v. Thompson
11 S.W.2d 380 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1928)
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Rutledge
15 S.W.2d 207 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1928)
Tiemann v. Loesch
285 S.W. 338 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1926)
Hales v. Peters
162 S.W. 386 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 Tex. 682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/headley-v-obenchain-tex-1871.