Headley v. Matthews

Indiana Supreme Court

Headley v. Matthews

19 Ind. 222

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 15, 1862

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 19 Ind. 222 (Headley v. Matthews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Headley v. Matthews, 19 Ind. 222 (Ind. 1862).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This was a complaint by PTeadley against Matthews and Tufts, under the statute concerning occupying claimants. Demurrer to the complaint sustained, and judgment for the defendants.

The complaint is somewhat lengthy, and it will subserve no good purpose to set it out here at length. We see no objection to it. No brief has been filed by the appellees [223]*223pointing out any defect, nor advising us upon what ground the demurrer was sustained.

II. W. Chase and J. A. Wilstach, for the appellant.

The judgment below is reversed, with costs, and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This was a complaint by PTeadley against Matthews and Tufts, under the statute concerning occupying claimants. Demurrer to the complaint sustained, and judgment for the defendants.

The complaint is somewhat lengthy, and it will subserve no good purpose to set it out here at length. We see no objection to it. No brief has been filed by the appellees [223]*223pointing out any defect, nor advising us upon what ground the demurrer was sustained.

II. W. Chase and J. A. Wilstach, for the appellant.

The judgment below is reversed, with costs, and the cause remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 Ind. 222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/headley-v-matthews-ind-1862.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack