Headlee v. State
167 N.E. 563, 89 Ind. App. 624, 1929 Ind. App. LEXIS 221
Opinion
Appellant was found guilty by a jury in the Rush Circuit Court of the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor. He assigns as error-that the verdict of the jury is not sustained by sufficient evidence and that the verdict is contrary to law.
Appellant certainly is not serious in this appeal. The evidence is not set out in his brief and we are unable to consider the alleged errors.
Fronczak v. State (1925), 197 Ind. 48, 149 N. E. 725.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Headlee v. State, 167 N.E. 563, 89 Ind. App. 624, 1929 Ind. App. LEXIS 221 (Ind. Ct. App. 1929).
167 N.E. 563 (Headlee v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fronczak v. State
149 N.E. 725 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1925)