Headlee v. Cloud

51 Mo. 301
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedJanuary 15, 1873
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 51 Mo. 301 (Headlee v. Cloud) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Headlee v. Cloud, 51 Mo. 301 (Mo. 1873).

Opinion

Adams, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This case comes up on a demurrer to the petition. In the caption of the petition, the plaintiff describes himself “as public administrator,” having charge of the partnership estate of John H. Caynor & Co., but it nowhere appears in the petition, by any allegation, that he was public administrator of [302]*302Greene County. The caption is simply a desoriptio personas and not a substantive allegation. The petition by proper averments ought to show the authority of the plaintiff, to bring such a suit. (State to use of Tapley’s Admr. vs. Matson, 38 Mo., 189.)

The demurrer also raises the objection that a public administrator, cannot be ordered to take charge of partnership assets of a deceased partner.

It is urged that only the surviving partners or the administrator on the individual estate of his deceased partner, can be, allowed to administer on the partnership effects.

Our statute concerning public administrators, (see 1 W. S., 122, § 8,) provides that it shall be the duty of the public administrator to take into his charge, etc., estates of deceased persons in his county, when from any good cause, the Probate Court shall so order, to prevent their being injured, wasted purloined or lost.

The estate of deceased partners or their interest in partnership effects, form no exception to this rule.

Tf the contingency referred to exists, the Probate Court may make the order; but the court could make no such order if there was an existing administrator, having charge of the partnership effects.

It does not appear on the face of this petition, that there was any such existing administration on the partnership, and therefore this ground of demurrer was not properly taken.

A public administrator after letters testamentary or of administration are granted, must, under the orders of the court, account for, pay and deliver to such rightful executor or administrator, all money property, &c., of every kind, in his possession. (1 W. S., 122, § 11.) When a public administrator takes possession under the order of the court of an estate, he cannot be divested of it in a collateral proceeding, but only on application to the Probate Court, under the section above referred to.

As the demurrer was properly sustained on the first point the Judgment is affirmed.

The other Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Koch v. Suter
1924 OK 816 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1924)
State ex rel. Jones v. Mallinckrodt Chemical Works
156 S.W. 967 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1913)
Barnes v. Stanley
69 S.W. 682 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1902)
Green v. Tittman
27 S.W. 391 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1894)
Rhoades v. McNulty
52 Mo. App. 301 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1893)
Wolff v. Ward
104 Mo. 127 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1891)
Becraft v. Lewis
41 Mo. App. 546 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1890)
Reynolds v. McMullen
22 N.W. 41 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1885)
State ex rel. Edwards v. Bartlett
68 Mo. 581 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1878)
Ayers v. Donnell
57 Mo. 396 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1874)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
51 Mo. 301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/headlee-v-cloud-mo-1873.