Headen v. Washington Area Transit Authority

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedMay 14, 2010
DocketCivil Action No. 2010-0784
StatusPublished

This text of Headen v. Washington Area Transit Authority (Headen v. Washington Area Transit Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Headen v. Washington Area Transit Authority, (D.D.C. 2010).

Opinion

FILED

MAY 1 lt 2010

uNm~:D sTATEs DrsTRrc'r coURT clerk U s D _

FoR THE DISTRrCT oF coLUMBrA C,,,,,,§ ,o',,~he‘§,‘,.g§r*l,c§ g§'é#;r':¢£gy

VERNK:E HEADEN, Plaintiff,

v. civil A¢cion No_ 10 (_)"{‘}54

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA, TRANSIT AUTHORITY,

£§/\'/\;\/\f\./SS§/

Defendant.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER STAYING CASE

This matter comes before the Court upon review of the pro se complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis. The application will be granted, but the case must be stayed.

Plaintiff alleges that she was disciplined and ultimately terminated from her employment with the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, and she brings claims of "Retaliation, Discrimination, Defamation of Character, Wrongful Termination, Emotional Distress and Hostile Work Enviromnent." Compl. at 6 (page number designated by the Court). The Court presumes that plaintiff brings this action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000 et seq.

The issuance of a right to sue letter from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is a condition precedent to the filing of an action such as this in federal court. 42 U.S.C. §§ ZOOOe-S(t), 2000e-16(d). In the absence of the issuance of a right to sue letter within 180 days of filing charges with the agency, the plaintiff is obligated to request that such

a letter be issued. See 29 C.F.R. § 1601.28.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that plaintit`l"s application to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is STAYED, and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that, xvithin 30 days of the date of entry of this Order, plaintiff must provide the Court with a right to sue letter indicating a final determination of plaintiff’s

charge. Failure to do so will rcstilt in the dismissal of this action.

g/O»~ <5///»¢/<\_

United States District Judge

SO ORDERED.

DATE;

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 2000
42 U.S.C. § 2000

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Headen v. Washington Area Transit Authority, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/headen-v-washington-area-transit-authority-dcd-2010.