Head v. Woods

17 S.E. 928, 92 Ga. 548
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 24, 1893·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

[548] Judgment affirmed.

The plaintiff introduced a certified copy of the verdict and judgment in the claim case. The certificate was dated September 11, 1889. In the caption of the copy appeared “ September term, 1888.” At" the close of the judgment, as transcribed,were the words, “Judgment signed this Sept. 27th, 1889.” The surety objected that the certificate showed on its face that it was not true, and on this account the alleged judgment was not admissible. E. F. Hinton and E. H. Cutts, for plaintiff in error. J. H. Lumpkin and "W. H. & C. R. McCrory, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Head v. Woods, 17 S.E. 928, 92 Ga. 548 (Ga. 1893).

17 S.E. 928 (Head v. Woods) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Murphy
60 S.E. 831 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1908)
Daniel v. State
40 S.E. 805 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)