Head v. Woods

Supreme Court of Georgia

Head v. Woods

17 S.E. 928, 92 Ga. 548

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJuly 24, 1893

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 17 S.E. 928 (Head v. Woods) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Head v. Woods, 17 S.E. 928, 92 Ga. 548 (Ga. 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

[548]*548 Judgment affirmed.

The plaintiff introduced a certified copy of the verdict and judgment in the claim case. The certificate was dated September 11, 1889. In the caption of the copy appeared “ September term, 1888.” At" the close of the judgment, as transcribed,were the words, “Judgment signed this Sept. 27th, 1889.” The surety objected that the certificate showed on its face that it was not true, and on this account the alleged judgment was not admissible.

E. F. Hinton and E. H. Cutts, for plaintiff in error. J. H. Lumpkin and "W. H. & C. R. McCrory, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[548]*548 Judgment affirmed.

The plaintiff introduced a certified copy of the verdict and judgment in the claim case. The certificate was dated September 11, 1889. In the caption of the copy appeared “ September term, 1888.” At" the close of the judgment, as transcribed,were the words, “Judgment signed this Sept. 27th, 1889.” The surety objected that the certificate showed on its face that it was not true, and on this account the alleged judgment was not admissible.

E. F. Hinton and E. H. Cutts, for plaintiff in error. J. H. Lumpkin and "W. H. & C. R. McCrory, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 S.E. 928, 92 Ga. 548, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/head-v-woods-ga-1893.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack