Head v. Texas Rawhide Paving Co.
This text of 22 F.2d 554 (Head v. Texas Rawhide Paving Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A reversal is sought in this ease because of the overruling of a motion of the plaintiff in error, the defendant below, “to strike out all of the oral evidence,” and because of the action of the court in giving and refusing instructions to the jury. The last-mentioned rulings are not subject to be reviewed, because none of them was excepted to. The above-mentioned motion was made after the admission, without objection, so far as the record shows, of much ■oral evidence, some'at least of which was plainly admissible. Manifestly the overruling of that motion was not reversible error.
No reversible error bein'g shown by the record, the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
22 F.2d 554, 1927 U.S. App. LEXIS 3382, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/head-v-texas-rawhide-paving-co-ca5-1927.