Head v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Head v. State

87 S.E. 689, 17 Ga. App. 479, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 712

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 11, 1916

Docket6785

StatusPublished

This text of 87 S.E. 689 (Head v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Head v. State, 87 S.E. 689, 17 Ga. App. 479, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 712 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Wade, J.

The evidence was sufficient to authorize the conclusion reached by the jury, that the sale of cotton made by the minor son of the accused was made with the consent of the accused, and therefore by him. The evidence sufficiently established the other essential averments contained in the indictment, and the trial judge did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial, based on general grounds only.

Judgment affirmed.

Russell, O. J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wade, J.

The evidence was sufficient to authorize the conclusion reached by the jury, that the sale of cotton made by the minor son of the accused was made with the consent of the accused, and therefore by him. The evidence sufficiently established the other essential averments contained in the indictment, and the trial judge did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial, based on general grounds only.

Judgment affirmed.

Russell, O. J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

87 S.E. 689, 17 Ga. App. 479, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 712, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/head-v-state-gactapp-1916.