Head v. State

68 S.E. 616, 8 Ga. App. 117, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 64
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 25, 1910·No. 2715·Published

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

The criticisms made as to excerpts from the charge, when considered in connection wdth the entire charge, are without substantial merit. Ho error of law was committed on the trial, and the evidence clearly and fully supports the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Head v. State, 68 S.E. 616, 8 Ga. App. 117, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 64 (Ga. Ct. App. 1910).

68 S.E. 616 (Head v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.