Head v. State
87 S.E. 273, 144 Ga. 383, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 212
Opinion
1. Some of the grounds of the motion for new trial are incomplete and can not be understood without resorting to an examination of the brief of evidence, and fail to present any question for decision. Sims v. Sims, 131 Ga. 262 (62 S. E. 192).
2. Such of the grounds of the motion as are sufficiently definite to present any question for decision are without merit, and are not of such character as to require elaboration.
3. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Head v. State, 87 S.E. 273, 144 Ga. 383, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 212 (Ga. 1915).
87 S.E. 273 (Head v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bryant v. State
121 S.E.2d 920 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1961)
Martin v. Smith
87 S.E.2d 406 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1955)
Williamson v. Prather
4 S.E.2d 140 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Trammell v. Shirley
145 S.E. 486 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Bank of LaGrange v. Commercial Credit Co.
121 S.E. 142 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)
Stanford v. State
112 S.E. 130 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1922)
Commercial Security Co. v. Hooks Pharmacy
108 S.E. 806 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)
Starling v. State
100 S.E. 771 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)
Paceley v. State
100 S.E. 773 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Stovall-Pace Co.
100 S.E. 657 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)
Cæsar v. State
97 S.E. 255 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
Thacher v. Carolina Portland Cement Co.
94 S.E. 838 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
Hawkes Co. v. Cowart Co.
94 S.E. 643 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Flowery Branch Gin & Oil Co. v. Shore
93 S.E. 70 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Copeland v. Ruff
92 S.E. 955 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Southern Railway Co. v. Williams
91 S.E. 1001 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Smiley v. Smiley
87 S.E. 668 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1916)