Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Head v. State

Head v. State

87 S.E. 273, 144 Ga. 383, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 212
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedDecember 15, 1915
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 87 S.E. 273 (Head v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Head v. State, 87 S.E. 273, 144 Ga. 383, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 212 (Ga. 1915).

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

1. Some of the grounds of the motion for new trial are incomplete and can not be understood without resorting to an examination of the brief of evidence, and fail to present any question for decision. Sims v. Sims, 131 Ga. 262 (62 S. E. 192).

2. Such of the grounds of the motion as are sufficiently definite to present any question for decision are without merit, and are not of such character as to require elaboration.

3. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. O. M. Buhe, for plaintiff in error. Clifford Walker, attorney-general, JE. M. Owen, solicitor-general, and Mark Bolding, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bryant v. State
121 S.E.2d 920 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1961)
Martin v. Smith
87 S.E.2d 406 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1955)
Williamson v. Prather
4 S.E.2d 140 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Trammell v. Shirley
145 S.E. 486 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Bank of LaGrange v. Commercial Credit Co.
121 S.E. 142 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)
Stanford v. State
112 S.E. 130 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1922)
Commercial Security Co. v. Hooks Pharmacy
108 S.E. 806 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)
Starling v. State
100 S.E. 771 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)
Paceley v. State
100 S.E. 773 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Stovall-Pace Co.
100 S.E. 657 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)
Cæsar v. State
97 S.E. 255 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
Thacher v. Carolina Portland Cement Co.
94 S.E. 838 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
Hawkes Co. v. Cowart Co.
94 S.E. 643 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Flowery Branch Gin & Oil Co. v. Shore
93 S.E. 70 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Copeland v. Ruff
92 S.E. 955 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Southern Railway Co. v. Williams
91 S.E. 1001 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Smiley v. Smiley
87 S.E. 668 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
87 S.E. 273, 144 Ga. 383, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/head-v-state-ga-1915.