Head v. Rutherford County Sheriff's Department

Fourth Circuit

Head v. Rutherford County Sheriff's Department

118 F. App'x 670

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 11, 2004·No. No. 04-1893·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Timothy Daniel Head appeals the district court’s orders (1) dismissing Head’s claim that he was denied his Fourteenth Amendment property rights and (2) denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Head v. Rutherford County Sheriffs Dep’t, No. CA-04-45-1 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 20, 2004, and May 11, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Timothy Daniel Head appeals the district court’s orders (1) dismissing Head’s claim that he was denied his Fourteenth Amendment property rights and (2) denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Head v. Rutherford County Sheriffs Dep’t, No. CA-04-45-1 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 20, 2004, and May 11, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Head v. Rutherford County Sheriff's Department, 118 F. App'x 670 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

118 F. App'x 670 (Head v. Rutherford County Sheriff's Department) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.