Head v. Prudential Insurance

210 N.C. 203
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMay 20, 1936
StatusPublished

This text of 210 N.C. 203 (Head v. Prudential Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Head v. Prudential Insurance, 210 N.C. 203 (N.C. 1936).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The trial court correctly interpreted the privilege, accorded plaintiff in the compromise settlement, to mean that the matter could be reopened upon actual, rather than presumptive, proof of death prior to 30 December, 1923. Lewis v. Lewis, 185 N. C., 5, 115 S. E., 885. Plaintiff’s interpretation of the agreement would render the settlement meaningless.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lewis v. . Lewis
115 S.E. 885 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
210 N.C. 203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/head-v-prudential-insurance-nc-1936.