Head v. Prudential Insurance
210 N.C. 203
Opinion
The trial court correctly interpreted the privilege, accorded plaintiff in the compromise settlement, to mean that the matter could be reopened upon actual, rather than presumptive, proof of death prior to 30 December, 1923. Lewis v. Lewis, 185 N. C., 5, 115 S. E., 885. Plaintiff’s interpretation of the agreement would render the settlement meaningless.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Head v. Prudential Insurance, 210 N.C. 203 (N.C. 1936).
210 N.C. 203 (Head v. Prudential Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lewis v. . Lewis
115 S.E. 885 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1923)