Head v. Missouri State Highway Patrol

Missouri Court of Appeals

Head v. Missouri State Highway Patrol

453 S.W.3d 862, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 102, 2015 WL 427922

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 3, 2015·No. ED 101336·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Walter Head appeals from the trial court’s judgment dismissing his petition for negligence with prejudice. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s judgment was not an abuse of discretion. Black v. Rite Mortgage and Financial Inc., 239 S.W.3d 165, 167 (Mo.App.E.D.2007); Rule 67.06.¹ An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Walter Head appeals from the trial court’s judgment dismissing his petition for negligence with prejudice. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s judgment was not an abuse of discretion. Black v. Rite Mortgage and Financial Inc., 239 S.W.3d 165, 167 (Mo.App.E.D.2007); Rule 67.06.¹ An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Head v. Missouri State Highway Patrol, 453 S.W.3d 862, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 102, 2015 WL 427922 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

453 S.W.3d 862 (Head v. Missouri State Highway Patrol) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related