Head v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Head v. Johnson

155 S.E. 499, 42 Ga. App. 164, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 272

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 7, 1930

Docket20596

StatusPublished

This text of 155 S.E. 499 (Head v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Head v. Johnson, 155 S.E. 499, 42 Ga. App. 164, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 272 (Ga. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The sole assignment of error in the bill of exceptions is upon the overruling of the motion for a new trial which contained the usual general grounds only. There was some evidence which authorized [165]*165the verdict, and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial court, this court is without authority to interfere.

Decided October 7, 1930. O. A. Williams, for plaintiff in error. J. A. Roberts, contra.

Judgment affirmed,.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

The sole assignment of error in the bill of exceptions is upon the overruling of the motion for a new trial which contained the usual general grounds only. There was some evidence which authorized [165]*165the verdict, and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial court, this court is without authority to interfere.

Decided October 7, 1930. O. A. Williams, for plaintiff in error. J. A. Roberts, contra.

Judgment affirmed,.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

155 S.E. 499, 42 Ga. App. 164, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/head-v-johnson-gactapp-1930.