Head v. Crouch

63 S.E.2d 647, 207 Ga. 648, 1951 Ga. LEXIS 482
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided February 13, 1951·No. 17368·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

The undisputed evidence, showing that the petition to enjoin the maintenance of obstructions in an area designated more than 20 years previously by the common grantor as a street was not filed until the obstructions, which were two dwelling houses, were completed — although the petitioners knew that they were being built — ■ shows such a lack of diligence as will, irrespective of any legal rights, deny to the petitioner any relief in equity. Dulin v. Caldwell, 28 Ga. 117; Southern Marble Co. v. Darnell, 94 Ga. 232 (21 S. E. 531); Holt v. Parsons, 118 Ga. 895 (45 S. E. 690); City of Marietta v. Dobbins, 150 Ga. 422 (104 S. E. 444); Whipkey v. Turner, 206 Ga. 410 (57 S. E. 2d, 481). The exception here is to the directed verdict in favor of the defendants, and is without merit.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Head v. Crouch, 63 S.E.2d 647, 207 Ga. 648, 1951 Ga. LEXIS 482 (Ga. 1951).

63 S.E.2d 647 (Head v. Crouch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davies v. Curry
196 S.E.2d 382 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1973)
Cox v. Zucker
102 S.E.2d 580 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1958)
Hannah v. Kenny
83 S.E.2d 1 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1954)