Head v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Head v. Commonwealth

12 Ky. Op. 11, 4 Ky. L. Rptr. 824, 1883 Ky. LEXIS 106

CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky

DecidedMarch 8, 1883

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 12 Ky. Op. 11 (Head v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Head v. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. Op. 11, 4 Ky. L. Rptr. 824, 1883 Ky. LEXIS 106 (Ky. Ct. App. 1883).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Judge Hargis:

The appellant was indicted, tried and convicted of the offense of wilful and malicious cutting and wounding with intent to kill, and sentenced to the penitentiary for the period of one year. From this sentence he appealed.

The serious error committed against his substantial rights was in giving the first instruction, by which the jury were told if the appellant wilfully and maliciously cut and wounded James A. Wathen with a knife, etc., they should find him guilty,-etc. The acts set forth in the instruction did not constitute the statutory offense with which appellant was charged. It is a felony under our statute (Gen. Stat. [1881] Ch. 29, Art. 6, Sec. 2) to wilfully and maliciously cut or stab another with intent to kill, but it is not a felony to wilfully and maliciously cut or stab without such intent where death does not ensue; hence the instruction ought to- have contained the additional words “with intent to kill” or their equivalent. The jury were authorized to find appellant guilty of a felony on facts which constituted a misdemeanor only, and which did not constitute the offense for which he was indicted.

For these- reasons the instruction was erroneous and the judgment is reversed and cause remanded with directions to grant appellant a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Judge Hargis:

The appellant was indicted, tried and convicted of the offense of wilful and malicious cutting and wounding with intent to kill, and sentenced to the penitentiary for the period of one year. From this sentence he appealed.

The serious error committed against his substantial rights was in giving the first instruction, by which the jury were told if the appellant wilfully and maliciously cut and wounded James A. Wathen with a knife, etc., they should find him guilty,-etc. The acts set forth in the instruction did not constitute the statutory offense with which appellant was charged. It is a felony under our statute (Gen. Stat. [1881] Ch. 29, Art. 6, Sec. 2) to wilfully and maliciously cut or stab another with intent to kill, but it is not a felony to wilfully and maliciously cut or stab without such intent where death does not ensue; hence the instruction ought to- have contained the additional words “with intent to kill” or their equivalent. The jury were authorized to find appellant guilty of a felony on facts which constituted a misdemeanor only, and which did not constitute the offense for which he was indicted.

For these- reasons the instruction was erroneous and the judgment is reversed and cause remanded with directions to grant appellant a new trial.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 Ky. Op. 11, 4 Ky. L. Rptr. 824, 1883 Ky. LEXIS 106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/head-v-commonwealth-kyctapp-1883.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack