Head v. Bridges

70 Ga. 729
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedApril 3, 1883
StatusPublished

This text of 70 Ga. 729 (Head v. Bridges) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Head v. Bridges, 70 Ga. 729 (Ga. 1883).

Opinion

This case'was called and continued on account of sickness of one of counsel for plaintiff in’error. On the next day, counsel for defendants in error moved the court to reconsider its action,’ and set the case for a later day during the same term. The motion alleged that a common law suit and the administration of an estate was held in suspense by injunction until the decision of the Supreme Court could be had; that the case had been carried forward by continuances since the August term, 1882, of Monroe superior court; that at the last term of the Supreme Court a diminution of the record had been suggested, and a continuance resulted, and that, on an examination of the record, this suggestion proved tobe a mistake. The motion was accompanied by an agreement of counsel for plaintiff in error that the case might be heard at the heel of the Augusta circuit, provided the counsel who was ill should then be able to appear:

[730]*730Held, that after a case has been regularly called and continued for the term, it cannot be reinstated on the docket and set by agreement.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
70 Ga. 729, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/head-v-bridges-ga-1883.