Head v. Aycock

Supreme Court of Georgia

Head v. Aycock

157 S.E.2d 293, 223 Ga. 608, 1967 Ga. LEXIS 625

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided September 21, 1967·No. 24255·Published

Opinion

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

The only questions involved in this case are: (1) could the client in a divorce case discharge her attorney without cause; and (2) what additional compensation is he entitled to and by whom must it be paid? It is obvious that the case is not among those within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Supreme Court under the Constitution, Art. VI, Sec. II, Par. IV (Const, of 1945, Code Ann. § 2-3704).

Transferred to the Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

The only questions involved in this case are: (1) could the client in a divorce case discharge her attorney without cause; and (2) what additional compensation is he entitled to and by whom must it be paid? It is obvious that the case is not among those within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Supreme Court under the Constitution, Art. VI, Sec. II, Par. IV (Const, of 1945, Code Ann. § 2-3704).

Transferred to the Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur.

Head v. Aycock, 157 S.E.2d 293, 223 Ga. 608, 1967 Ga. LEXIS 625 (Ga. 1967).

Pincite

157 S.E.2d 293 (Head v. Aycock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.