Head Ski Company, Inc. v. United States

454 F.2d 732, 29 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 496, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 11618
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 26, 1972·No. 71-1544·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The government appeals from the entry of summary judgment in favor of Head Ski Company granting a refund of income tax for 1965. 1

The sole issue is whether a premium Head Ski paid for the redemption of a convertible note was deductible as a business expense or nondeductible as a capital outlay. Applying Treasury Regulation § 1.61-12(e) (1) (1965), 2 the district court held that the premium was deductible. In reaching this conclusion, it relied primarily on Southwest Grease & Oil Company, Inc. v. United States, 435 F.2d 675 (10th Cir. 1971), and Roberts & Porter, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 307 F.2d 745 (7th Cir. 1962), which in their material aspects are indistinguishable. We affirm.

1

. Head Ski Co. v. United States, 323 F. S,upp. 1383 (D.Md.1971).

2

. Tlie transaction occurred before the effective date of 26 U.S.C. § 249 (1969), which contains a limitation on the deduction of a premium paid to repurchase convertible obligations.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Head Ski Company, Inc. v. United States, 454 F.2d 732, 29 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 496, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 11618 (4th Cir. 1972).

454 F.2d 732 (Head Ski Company, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

National Can Corp. v. United States
520 F. Supp. 567 (N.D. Illinois, 1981)
Richmond, F. & P. R. Co. v. Commissioner
62 T.C. No. 20 (U.S. Tax Court, 1974)
Hunt Foods & Industries, Inc. v. Commissioner
57 T.C. 633 (U.S. Tax Court, 1972)