HD Dev. Co. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision

5 N.E.3d 660, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1441
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 18, 2014·No. 2012-1404·Published

Opinion

Board of Tax Appeals, Nos. 2009-K-57 through 2009-K-99 and 2011-K-1042 through 2011-K-1084. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals.

Upon consideration of the joint motion to remand the appeal in order to implement the settlement, [1442] it is ordered by the court that the motion is granted and this case is remanded to the Board of Tax Appeals so that the board may take further action as appropriate.

It is further ordered that a mandate be sent to the Board of Tax Appeals to carry this judgment into execution and that a copy of this entry be certified to the Board of Tax Appeals.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HD Dev. Co. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision, 5 N.E.3d 660, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1441 (Ohio 2014).

5 N.E.3d 660 (HD Dev. Co. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.