(HC)Singh v. Pfeiffer

• Court: District Court, E.D. California
• Decided: September 23, 2021
• Docket: 2:21-cv-01731
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 RAGHVENDRA SINGH, Case No. 1:21-cv-01406-EPG-HC

12 Petitioner, ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE SACRAMENTO DIVISION OF THE 13 v. EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14 C. PFEIFFER,

15 Respondent.

16 17 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus 18 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 19 When a state prisoner files a habeas petition in a state that contains two or more federal 20 judicial districts, the petition may be filed in either the judicial district in which the petitioner is 21 presently confined or the judicial district in which he was convicted and sentenced. See 28 22 U.S.C. § 2241(d); Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426, 442 (2004) (quoting Carbo v. United 23 States, 364 U.S. 611, 618, 81 S. Ct. 338, 5 L. Ed. 2d 329 (1961)). Petitions challenging the 24 execution of a sentence are preferably heard in the district where the inmate is confined. See 25 Dunne v. Henman, 875 F.2d 244, 249 (9th Cir. 1989). Petitions challenging convictions or 26 sentences are preferably heard in the district of conviction. See Laue v. Nelson, 279 F. Supp. 27 265, 266 (N.D. Cal. 1968). Section 2241 further states that, rather than dismissing an improperly 1 | transfer” the habeas petition to another federal district for hearing and determination. Id.; see also 2 | 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) (court may transfer any civil action “to any other district or division where it 3 | might have been brought” for convenience of parties or “in the interest of justice”). 4 Here, Petitioner’s claims relate to his convictions and sentence from the Sacramento 5 | County Superior Court, which is part of the Sacramento Division of the United States District 6 | Court for the Eastern District of California. Therefore, venue is proper in the Sacramento 7 | Division. Local Rule 120(d). 8 Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper 9 | court may, on the court’s own motion, be transferred to the proper court. Therefore, this action 10 | will be transferred to the Sacramento Division. This Court has not ruled on Petitioner’s request to 11 | proceed in forma pauperis. 12 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 13 1. This action is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Eastern 14 | District of California sitting in Sacramento; and 15 2. All future filings shall reference the new Sacramento case number assigned and shall 16 | be filed at: 17 United States District Court Eastern District of California 18 501 “I” Street, Suite 4-200 19 Sacramento, CA 95814

20 21 | IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 Dated: _ September 23, 2021 Fahey — UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 24 25 26 27 28