H.C.M. v. State

922 So. 2d 447, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 3455, 2006 WL 565925
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 10, 2006
DocketNos. 5D05-896, 5D05-960, 5D05-1025
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 922 So. 2d 447 (H.C.M. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
H.C.M. v. State, 922 So. 2d 447, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 3455, 2006 WL 565925 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

PALMER, J.

In this consolidated appeal, H.C.M. (defendant) appeals several juvenile delinquency disposition orders. We affirm in part, and reverse in part.

As to defendant’s contention that the trial court erred in finding him guilty of resisting arrest without violence, we conclude that the State’s evidence was sufficient to overcome the defendant’s judgment of acquittal motion and, accordingly, affirm.

As to the defendant’s argument that the trial court reversibly erred in imposing $5,500.00 in court fines ($5,000.00 in the first case and $500.00 in the second case), we agree, based upon the reasoning of J.S. v. State, 920 So.2d 752 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006), and strike said fines.

ADJUDICATION AND DISPOSITION ORDERS AFFIRMED, FINES STRICKEN.

SHARP, W., and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nelson v. State
922 So. 2d 447 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
922 So. 2d 447, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 3455, 2006 WL 565925, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hcm-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.