HCA Equipment Finance, LLC v. Mastrantone
This text of 118 A.D.3d 850 (HCA Equipment Finance, LLC v. Mastrantone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Lubell, J.), dated February 27, 2013, which, upon an order of the same court dated January 11, 2013, granting the plaintiff’s unopposed motion for summary judg[851]*851ment on the complaint and to dismiss the affirmative defenses, among other things, is in favor of the plaintiff and against him in the principal sum of $117,055.46.
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.
The defendant failed to submit papers to the Supreme Court in opposition to the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the complaint and to dismiss the affirmative defenses, and the motion was granted on default. “No appeal lies from an order or judgment granted upon the default of the appealing party” (J.F.J. Fuel, Inc. v Tran Camp Contr. Corp., 105 AD3d 908, 908 [2013]; see CPLR 5511). Since the judgment appealed from was entered upon the defendant’s default in opposing the motion, the appeal must be dismissed (see Lumbermen’s Mut. Cas. Co. v Fireman’s Fund Am. Ins. Co., 117 AD2d 588 [1986]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
118 A.D.3d 850, 987 N.Y.S.2d 240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hca-equipment-finance-llc-v-mastrantone-nyappdiv-2014.