(HC) West v. California Correctional Health Care Services

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. California
DecidedFebruary 25, 2021
Docket2:21-cv-00330
StatusUnknown

This text of (HC) West v. California Correctional Health Care Services ((HC) West v. California Correctional Health Care Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
(HC) West v. California Correctional Health Care Services, (E.D. Cal. 2021).

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHN DANIEL WEST, No. 2:21-cv-0330-EFB P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER 14 CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE SERVICES, 15 Respondent. 16

17 Petitioner is a state prisoner without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 18 28 U.S.C. § 2254. However, he has neither filed an application for leave to proceed in forma 19 pauperis nor paid the required filing fee ($5.00). See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a); 1915(a). Petitioner 20 will be provided the opportunity to either submit a request to proceed in forma pauperis or submit 21 the appropriate filing fee.1 22 23 1 Federal courts offer two main avenues to relief on complaints related to one’s 24 imprisonment – a petition for habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Challenges to the validity of one’s confinement or the 25 duration of one’s confinement are properly brought in a habeas action, whereas requests for relief 26 turning on the circumstances of one’s confinement are properly brought in a § 1983 action. Muhammad v. Close, 540 U.S. 749, 750 (2004). If petitioner intends to challenge the conditions 27 of his confinement (as opposed to the duration thereof), he must file a complaint using this court’s form for civil rights actions brought by prisoners. He shall also note that the required 28 filing fee for a civil action is $402. 1 In accordance with the above, IT IS ORDERED that: 2 1. Petitioner shall submit, within thirty days from the date of service of this order, a 3 request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee; petitioner’s failure 4 to comply with this order may result in this action being dismissed; and 5 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis 6 form used by this district. 7 || Dated: February 25, 2021. > 8 / EDMUND F. BRENNAN 9 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Muhammad v. Close
540 U.S. 749 (Supreme Court, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
(HC) West v. California Correctional Health Care Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hc-west-v-california-correctional-health-care-services-caed-2021.