(HC) Weisner v. Allison

E.D. California

(HC) Weisner v. Allison

DecidedJanuary 3, 2024

Docket2:23-cv-00662

StatusUnknown

This text of (HC) Weisner v. Allison ((HC) Weisner v. Allison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

(HC) Weisner v. Allison, (E.D. Cal. 2024).

Pincite

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FRANKIE WEISNER, No. 2:23-cv-0662 DAD AC P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 KATHLEEN ALLISON, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a habeas corpus petition filed pursuant 18 to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On June 23, 2023, respondent filed a motion to dismiss the petition. ECF 19 No. 14. On November 28, 2023, petitioner was ordered to file and serve, within twenty-one days, 20 an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the pending motion. ECF No. 19. In the same 21 order, petitioner was informed that failure to file an opposition would result in a recommendation 22 that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of 23 Civil Procedure 41(b). The twenty-one-day period has now expired, and petitioner has filed a 24 response to the motion to dismiss or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 25 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 26 prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). 27 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 28 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 1 | after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 2 || objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 3 || “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 4 || objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 5 || parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 6 || appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 7 | DATED: January 2, 2024 ~ 8 Lhar—e_ ALLISON CLAIRE 9 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FRANKIE WEISNER, No. 2:23-cv-0662 DAD AC P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 KATHLEEN ALLISON, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a habeas corpus petition filed pursuant 18 to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On June 23, 2023, respondent filed a motion to dismiss the petition. ECF 19 No. 14. On November 28, 2023, petitioner was ordered to file and serve, within twenty-one days, 20 an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the pending motion. ECF No. 19. In the same 21 order, petitioner was informed that failure to file an opposition would result in a recommendation 22 that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of 23 Civil Procedure 41(b). The twenty-one-day period has now expired, and petitioner has filed a 24 response to the motion to dismiss or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 25 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 26 prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). 27 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 28 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 1 | after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 2 || objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 3 || “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 4 || objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 5 || parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 6 || appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 7 | DATED: January 2, 2024 ~ 8 Lhar—e_ ALLISON CLAIRE 9 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

(HC) Weisner v. Allison, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hc-weisner-v-allison-caed-2024.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack