H.C. v. Department of Children & Families

161 So. 3d 503, 2014 WL 3805524, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12147
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 4, 2014·No. No. 5D14-1225·Published

Opinion

PALMER, J.

H.C. (mother) appeals the final order entered by the trial court denying her motion to re-open her children’s dependency case in order to modify the trial court’s previously entered order placing children in permanent guardianship with their paternal grandparents.1 We affirm the trial court’s order because, contrary to the mother’s claim otherwise, it is the parent’s burden of proving that the safety, well-being, and physical, mental, and emotional health of the child(ren) would not be endangered by reunification; the Department of Children and Families has no burden of proof in reunification proceedings.

AFFIRMED.

TORPY, C.J. and LAMBERT, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

H.C. v. Department of Children & Families, 161 So. 3d 503, 2014 WL 3805524, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12147 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

161 So. 3d 503 (H.C. v. Department of Children & Families) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

JM v. Department of Children and Families
969 So. 2d 491 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)