(HC) Tafoya v. Holbrook

District Court, E.D. California·Decided September 26, 2022·No. 1:22-cv-00932·Unknown

Opinion

FIDEL TAFOYA, Case No. 1:22-cv-932-AWI-BAK Petitioner, ORDER v. DAVID HOLBROOK, Warden, Respondent. The Court having received the unopposed motion of Respondent to unseal pages 31-35 of Volume 1A of the Reporter’s Transcript containing a portion of the transcript from an ex parte hearing conducted on September 12, 2019, in accordance with People v. Marsden, 2 Cal.3d 118 (1970), and the Court finding that it is appropriate to unseal this portion of the record, the Court hereby ORDERS: 1. Respondent’s Motion to Unseal Portion of State Court Marsden Transcript be GRANTED and the pages of the record set forth in the motion be unsealed. /// /// 2. Respondent SHALL FILE a RESPONSE to the petition within THIRTY (30) DAYS of the date of service of this order. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 26, 2022 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto . UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(HC) Tafoya v. Holbrook, (E.D. Cal. 2022).

(HC) Tafoya v. Holbrook ((HC) Tafoya v. Holbrook) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Marsden
465 P.2d 44 (California Supreme Court, 1970)