(HC) Sisounthone v. Neuschmid

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 VANNA SISOUNTHONE, No. 2:18-cv-3181 DAD AC P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER 14 ROBERT NEUSCHMID, Warden, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner has requested an extension of time to file and serve a motion for reconsideration 18 of the court’s order issued November 8, 2022. ECF No. 21. That order directed petitioner to file 19 a request to stay these proceedings pursuant to Rhines v. Weber, 544 U.S. 269 (2005) or Kelly v. 20 Small, 315 F.3d 1063 (9th Cir. 2002). See ECF No. 20 (court order). 21 In support of the motion, petitioner states in part that he has limited access to the prison 22 law library due to staff shortages and the upcoming holidays. ECF No. 21 at 2. Good cause 23 appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 24 1. Petitioner’s request for an extension of time (ECF No. 21) is GRANTED, and 25 //// 26 //// 27 //// 28 //// ] 2. Petitioner shall file and serve a motion for reconsideration within sixty days from the 2 | date of this order. 3 | DATED: December 9, 2022 ~ 4 AMten—Clone ALLISON CLAIRE 5 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28