(HC) Sergio Torres v. Acting Warden
Opinion
SERGIO TORRES, Case No. 1:20-cv-01001-JLT-CDB (HC)
Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING v. THE FIRST AMENDED PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS WITH
Respondent. (Doc. 36)
On October 12, 2022, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations to dismiss the first amended petition as untimely. The Court served the findings and recommendations on Petitioner and gave him 30 days to file objections thereto. Petitioner’s deadline for filing objections if any was November 11, 2022. The findings and recommendations advised Petitioner that “failure to follow this order may result in a recommendation for dismissal of the petition pursuant to Federal Rule of Procedure 41(b).” On November 18, 2022 (i.e., one week after objections were due to be filed), Petitioner filed his “Objections to Findings and Recommendations.” (Doc. 37). Failure to file objections within the specified time waives all objections to the magistrate judge’s findings. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998). Even considering Petitioner’s belatedly filed limitation period under 28 U.S.C. 2244(d)(1). According to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes the findings and recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis. Based upon the foregoing, the Court ORDERS: 1. The findings and recommendations issued on October 12, 2022 (Doc. 36) are 2. The First Amended Petition for Habeas Corpus (Doc. 34) is DISMISSED. 3. The Clerk of Court be directed to close this case. ITISSO ORDERED. 12] Dated: _ December 13,2022 Charis [Tourn TED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
(HC) Sergio Torres v. Acting Warden ((HC) Sergio Torres v. Acting Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.