(HC) Sambrano v. Cates

District Court, E.D. California·Decided September 16, 2021·No. 1:21-cv-01365·Unknown

Opinion

OSCAR FERNANDO SAMBRANO, Case No. 1:21-cv-01365-HBK Petitioner, ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA v. (Doc. No. 1) Respondent.

Petitioner is proceeding on his petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc. No. 1). Petitioner is a prisoner incarcerated in Kern County, which is located within the jurisdiction and venue of this Court. Petitioner challenges his July 12, 2019 state sentence and conviction entered by the Superior Court of Riverside County, which is located within the jurisdiction and venue of the Eastern Division of the United States District Court for the Central District of California.1 Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d), jurisdiction is proper in the judicial district where the petitioner was convicted or where the petitioner is incarcerated. Therefore, both the Central 1 The Petitioner also appears to make claims related to conditions of confinement and the Covid-19 pandemic, but these claims are not at the root of the habeas petition or viable via a habeas petition. District of California and the Eastern District of California have concurrent jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d); Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426, 428 (2004). However, “[fJor the convenience of parties and witnesses, in the interest of justice, a district court may transfer any civil action to any other district or division where it might have been brought.” 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). Federal courts in California generally hear petitions for writ of habeas corpus in the district of conviction. Favor v. California, No. 116-CV-01912-DAD-EPG-HC, 2017 WL 2671006, at *1 (E.D. Cal. June 21, 2017) (citing Laue v. Nelson, 279 F. Supp. 265, 266 (N.D. Cal. 1968). Thus, the Court finds in its discretion “and in furtherance of justice” the petition should be transferred to the Central District of California. 28 U.S.C. 88 1404(a), 2241(d). Accordingly 1. The Clerk shall transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Eastern Division; and 2. All future filings shall reference the new case number assigned and shall be filed at: United States District Court Central District of California Eastern Division 3470 Twelfth Street Riverside, CA 92501-3801 SZ, Li Dated: _ September 16, 2021 Lhep_o TA. Bareh 7 HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA 53 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(HC) Sambrano v. Cates, (E.D. Cal. 2021).

(HC) Sambrano v. Cates ((HC) Sambrano v. Cates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rumsfeld v. Padilla
542 U.S. 426 (Supreme Court, 2004)
Laue v. Nelson
279 F. Supp. 265 (N.D. California, 1968)