(HC) Ramos Carrillo v. San Joaquin County Sheriff

• Court: District Court, E.D. California
• Decided: July 31, 2025
• Docket: 2:25-cv-01927
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LUCIO JUSTO RAMOS CARRILLO, No. 2:25-cv-1927 CSK P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER 14 SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY SHERIFF,1 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner is a county jail inmate proceeding pro se. On July 15, 2025, the Court ordered 18 petitioner to file a petition for writ of habeas corpus on the proper form, and to submit an 19 application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee. (ECF No. 3.) On July 24, 2025, 20 petitioner filed the application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and a 21 motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF Nos. 5, 6.) However, petitioner’s motion to proceed 22 in forma pauperis is incomplete. Petitioner did not answer question number three on page one, 23 and the form was not certified by jail officials as required at the bottom of page two. (EC No. 6.) 24 Petitioner is granted an extension of time to submit a completed application to proceed in forma 25 pauperis. 26 /// 27 1 The Sheriff of San Joaquin County is substituted as respondent. Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d); 28 Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426, 435 (2004). 1 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. Petitioner shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, a completed 3 || application to proceed in forma pauperis; petitioner’s failure to comply with this order will result 4 | recommendation that this action be dismissed; and 5 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis 6 || form used by this district. 7 8 | Dated: July 31, 2025 4 aA Cn Ye \L CHI SOO KIM 10 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 |} Arramo1927.ifp 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28