(HC) Poslof v. Attchley

District Court, E.D. California·Decided December 2, 2024·No. 1:21-cv-00339·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LONNIE LEE POSLOF, JR., Case. No. 1:21-cv-00339-JLT-HBK (HC) 12 Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S 13 v. MOTION TO WITHDRAW MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL 14 M. ATTCHLEY, WARDEN,

15 Respondent. ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO 16 FILE OBJECTIONS

17 (Doc. No. 33)

19 20 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this habeas corpus 21 action, filed a motion to withdraw his motion for voluntary dismissal (Doc. No. 31) and for an 22 extension of time to file objections to the undersigned’s November 15, 2024 Findings and 23 Recommendations to Deny Petitioner’s Motion to Stay (Doc. No. 32). (Doc. No. 33, “Motion”). 24 Petitioner seeks an extension of time to file objections to the Findings and 25 Recommendation because he is “currently in punitive segregation housing, with no legal resource 26 and materials.” (Doc. No. 33 at 2). For good cause shown, the Court will grant Petitioner a 14- 27 day extension of time to file objections. Petitioner also claims he was not served with a copy of 28 Respondent’s opposition to his motion to stay. (Id.). The Court notes that Respondent attached a 1 | declaration of service to their opposition to the motion to stay indicating it was mailed to 2 | Petitioner on November 1, 2024. (Doc. No. 29 at 5). Neither Petitioner’s pro se status nor his 3 | prisoner status entitled him to receive complimentary copies. Blair v. CDCR, 2018 WL 1959532, 4 | at *6n.2 (E.D. Cal. Apr. 25, 2018). Regardless, in order to expedite Petitioner’s preparation of 5 | his objections to the Findings and Recommendations, the Court will direct the Clerk to provide a 6 | courtesy copy of Respondent’s opposition to Petitioner’s motion for stay and abeyance (Doc. No. 7 | 29). 8 In addition, Petitioner asks to withdraw his motion for voluntary dismissal (Doc. No. 31) 9 | as it was filed in error “by another prisoner.” (Doc. No. 33 at 4). Based on Petitioner’s request, 10 | the motion for voluntary dismissal will be withdrawn. 11 Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 12 1. Petitioner’s Motion for Extension of Time (Doc. No. 33) is GRANTED to the limited 13 extent that Petitioner shall deliver any objections to the November 15, 2024 Findings 14 and Recommendations (Doc. No. 32) to correctional officials for mailing no later 15 than December 16, 2024. 16 2. The Clerk of Court shall provide a one-time courtesy copy of Respondent’s opposition 17 to the motion for stay and abeyance (Doc. No. 29) with this Order. 18 3. Petitoner’s Motion to Withdraw his Motion for Voluntary Dismissal (Doc. No. 31) is 19 GRANTED. 20 21 | Dated: _ December 2, 2024 ooo. Th. Bareh Hack HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(HC) Poslof v. Attchley, (E.D. Cal. 2024).

(HC) Poslof v. Attchley ((HC) Poslof v. Attchley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.