(HC) McCarter v. Broomfield

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 1] STEVEN MCCARTER, No. 2:22-cv-0462 KIM CKD P 12 Petitioner, 13 Vv. ORDER 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute 18 || right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 19 | (9th Cir. 1996). 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the 20 || case “if the interests of Justice so require.” See Rule 8(c), Fed. R. Governing § 2254 Cases. In 21 | the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the 22 || appointment of counsel at the present time. 23 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner’s motion for appointment of 24 || counsel (ECF No. 15) is denied without prejudice to a renewal of the motion at a later stage of the 25 || proceedings. 26 | Dated: April 19, 2022 □□ / del a 27 CAROLYN K DELANEY 28 | 12/meca0462.110.docx UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE