(HC) Limon-Uribe v. Brewer

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 Agustin Limon-Uribe, No. 2:23-cv-01125-KJM-DMC-P 12 Petitioner, ORDER 13 v.

14 Warden, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas 18 corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as 19 provided by Eastern District of California local rules. 20 On February 1, 2024, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations, which 21 were served on the parties, and which contained notice that the parties may file objections within 22 the time specified therein. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed. 23 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 24 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed 25 de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law 26 by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court 27 . . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be 28 supported by the record and by the proper analysis. ] Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed February 1, 2024, ECF No. 9, are adopted 3 | in full. 4 2. Respondent’s unopposed motion to dismiss, ECF No. 7, is GRANTED. 5 3. This action is DISMISSED. 6 4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file. 7 || DATED: March 21, 2024. 0 CHIEF ED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28