(HC) Le v. Field Office Director, San Francisco Field Office, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. California
DecidedOctober 16, 2024
Docket1:24-cv-01272
StatusUnknown

This text of (HC) Le v. Field Office Director, San Francisco Field Office, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement ((HC) Le v. Field Office Director, San Francisco Field Office, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
(HC) Le v. Field Office Director, San Francisco Field Office, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, (E.D. Cal. 2024).

Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 HUY HOANG LE, Case No. 24-cv-06162-SVK 8 Plaintiff, ORDER OF TRANSFER 9 V. 10 FIELD OFFICE DIRECTOR, SAN FRANCISCO FIELD OFFICE, UNITED 11 STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, et al., 12 Defendants.

= 13 In this federal habeas action, petitioner challenges the lawfulness of his continued . . . . 14 Il detention by the Department of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) pending . . Lye □□ . . 15 || his removal to Vietnam. Jurisdiction for habeas petitions by an ICE detainee challenging

a 16 the lawfulness of their present detention lies only in the district of confinement. Doe v. M7 Garland, 109 F.4th 1188, 1199 (9th Cir. 2024) (holding petition by immigration detainee O 18 challenging his detention is a “core habeas petition” that must be filed in the district of 19 confinement under Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426, 442 (2004). Petitioner is detained 20 by ICE at the Mesa Verde Processing Center in Bakersfield, California. Therefore, this 71 |! action is TRANSFERRED to the Eastern District of California. 28 U.S.C. §§ 84(b), 22 ll 1404(a), 2241(d). The Clerk shall transfer this action forthwith. 2 SO ORDERED. 24 Dated: October 16, 2024 25

27 Susan van Keulen United States Magistrate Judge 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rumsfeld v. Padilla
542 U.S. 426 (Supreme Court, 2004)
Martin v. Hall
9 Va. 8 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1852)
John Doe v. Merrick Garland
109 F.4th 1188 (Ninth Circuit, 2024)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
(HC) Le v. Field Office Director, San Francisco Field Office, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hc-le-v-field-office-director-san-francisco-field-office-united-states-caed-2024.