(HC) Khademi v. Placer County Sheriff

District Court, E.D. California·Decided January 12, 2024·No. 2:23-cv-02122·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 1] DAVOOD KHADEMI, No. 2:23-cv-2122 KIN P 12 Petitioner, 13 Vv. ORDER 14 PLACER COUNTY SHERIFF, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute right 18 || to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th 19 | Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of 20 | the case “if the interests of justice so require.” See Rule 8(c), Fed. R. Governing § 2254 Cases. 21 | In the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the 22 || appointment of counsel at the present time. 23 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner’s motion for appointment of 24 || counsel (ECF No. 17) is denied without prejudice. 25 Dated: January 12, 2024 26 Aectl Aharon 27 KENDALL J. NE /khad2122.1102) UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(HC) Khademi v. Placer County Sheriff, (E.D. Cal. 2024).

(HC) Khademi v. Placer County Sheriff ((HC) Khademi v. Placer County Sheriff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nevius v. Sumner
105 F.3d 453 (Ninth Circuit, 1996)