(HC) Khademi v. Placer County Sheriff
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 1] DAVOOD KHADEMI, No. 2:23-cv-2122 KIN P 12 Petitioner, 13 Vv. ORDER 14 PLACER COUNTY SHERIFF, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute right 18 || to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th 19 | Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of 20 | the case “if the interests of justice so require.” See Rule 8(c), Fed. R. Governing § 2254 Cases. 21 | In the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the 22 || appointment of counsel at the present time. 23 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner’s motion for appointment of 24 || counsel (ECF No. 17) is denied without prejudice. 25 Dated: January 12, 2024 26 Aectl Aharon 27 KENDALL J. NE /khad2122.1102) UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
(HC) Khademi v. Placer County Sheriff ((HC) Khademi v. Placer County Sheriff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.