(HC) Jones v. Sullivan
Opinion
CORNELIUS L. JONES, No. 2:19-cv-1160 WBS DB P Petitioner, v. ORDER Respondent. Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner challenges his 2014 convictions for attempted murder, assault with a deadly weapon, and assault likely to cause great bodily injury. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 18, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. //// Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 17, 2021, are adopted in full; 2. Petitioner’s motion to lift the stay (ECF No. 22) is granted; 3. The stay pursuant to Kelly v. Small, 315 F.3d 1063 (9th Cir. 2003) is lifted; 4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to reopen this action; and 5. Respondent shall file a response to the amended petition within sixty (60) days of the date of this Order. . Dated: May 19, 2021 bitte Ah ha bee WILLIAM B. SHUBB UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Jone1160/801.he
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
(HC) Jones v. Sullivan ((HC) Jones v. Sullivan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.