(HC) Hubbard v. People of the State of California

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DWAYNE ALLEN HUBBARD, No. 2:21-cv-00040 WBS GGH P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER 14 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OFCALIFORNIA, 15 Respondent. 16

17 18 Petitioner has filed a motion for stay pursuant to Rhines v. Weber, 544 U.S. 269 (2005). ECF 19 No. 15. Respondent has filed a statement of non-opposition. ECF No. 18. In his motion for stay, 20 however, petitioner has not identified which federal claims petitioner seeks to exhaust in state court. 21 Accordingly, petitioner is directed to file a response to this order within twenty days indicating which 22 unexhausted claims he seeks to pursue. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 Dated: April 20, 2021 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows 25 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26

27 28