(HC) Heath v. Dickinson

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 E. H., No. 2:24-cv-2551 CSK P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER 14 BILL DICKINSON, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant 18 to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner paid the filing fee. In his application, petitioner challenges a 19 conviction issued by the Kern County Juvenile Court.1 Kern County is part of the Fresno 20 Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. See Local Rule 21 120(d). 22 Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper 23 division of a court may, on the court’s own motion, be transferred to the proper division of the 24 court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the court. This Court 25 will not rule on petitioner’s request to proceed in forma pauperis. 26 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 27

28 1 See In re E.H., 2023 WL 3017659 (Cal. App. 2023). ] 1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of 2 | California sitting in Fresno; and 3 2. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and shall be 4 || filed at: United States District Court 5 Eastern District of California 2500 Tulare Street 6 Fresno, CA 93721 7 8 || Dated: October 1, 2024 eq - S$ . CHI SOO KIM 10 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1] 12 13 14 15 | Heath2551.109 16 | 2 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28