(HC) Gianakos v. United States
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MICHAEL SEAN GIANAKOS, Case No. 1:21-cv-01056-NONE-SKO-HC
Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO AMEND RESPONDENT v. [Doc. No. 6]
WARDEN WHITE, ORDER SUBSTITUTING WARDEN WHITE AS RESPONDENT IN THIS Respondent. MATTER
On July 6, 2021, Petitioner filed a federal petition for writ of habeas corpus. He named the United States of America as Respondent in this matter. On July 15, 2021, Petitioner filed a motion to amend the petition to name Warden White as Respondent in this matter. Warden White is the proper respondent as he is the warden at the petitioner’s institution and has “day-to-day control over” the petitioner. Brittingham v. United States, 982 F.2d 378, 379 (9th Cir. 1992). Accordingly, Petitioner’s motion to amend the respondent is GRANTED. Warden White is hereby SUBSTITUTED as Respondent in this matter. IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 16, 2021 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto . UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
(HC) Gianakos v. United States ((HC) Gianakos v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.