(HC) Frias-Guevara v. FCI Mendota Warden

District Court, E.D. California·Decided August 26, 2025·No. 1:23-cv-00195·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 MOISES FRIAS-GUEVARA, No. 1:23-cv-00195-KES-CDB (HC) 12 Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING THE 13 v. PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AS MOOT, AND DIRECTING THE 14 FCI MENDOTA WARDEN, CLERK OF THE COURT TO CLOSE THIS CASE 15 Respondent. Doc. 7 16 17 Moises Frias-Guevara, a federal prisoner, proceeds with a writ of habeas corpus pursuant 18 to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, asserting that the U.S. Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) improperly denied him 19 earned time credits under the First Step Act because he is the subject of an immigration detainer. 20 Doc. 1. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 21 § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 22 On July 25, 2025, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations to 23 dismiss the petition as moot. Doc. 7. The findings and recommendations stated that any 24 objections were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. Doc. 7 at 3. The findings and 25 recommendations were mailed to petitioner but returned as undeliverable. Petitioner did not file 26 objections, and the time to do so has passed. 27 According to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court performed a de novo review of the case. 28 Having carefully reviewed the matter, the Court concludes the findings and recommendations are 1 | supported by the record and proper analysis. 2 As the petition is brought under § 2241 and the detention complained of does not arise out 3 | of a process issued by a state court, no certificate of appealability is required. See Porter v. 4 | Adams, 244 F.3d 1006, 1006-07 (9th Cir. 2001) (citing Forde v. U.S. Parole Comm’n, 114 F.3d 5 | 878, 879 (9th Cir. 1997)). 6 Accordingly, 7 1. The findings and recommendations issued on July 25, 2025, Doc. 7, are ADOPTED in 8 full; 9 2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus, Doc. 1, is DISMISSED without prejudice as moot; 10 and 11 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. 12 13 14 | IIS SO ORDERED. _ 15 Dated: _ August 26, 2025 4h 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(HC) Frias-Guevara v. FCI Mendota Warden, (E.D. Cal. 2025).

(HC) Frias-Guevara v. FCI Mendota Warden ((HC) Frias-Guevara v. FCI Mendota Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related