(HC) Drister v. Arviza
Opinion
7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9
10 LEONARD O. DRISTER, Case No. 1:23-cv-01109-EPG-HC
11 Petitioner, ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF 12 v. COUNSEL
13 M. ARVIZA, (ECF No. 6) 14 Respondent.
15 16 Petitioner Leonard O. Drister is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for 17 writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. On August 3, 2023, the Court received the 18 instant motion for appointment of counsel. (ECF No. 6.) 19 There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. 20 See, e.g., Chaney v. Lewis, 801 F.2d 1191, 1196 (9th Cir. 1986); Anderson v. Heinze, 258 F.2d 21 479, 481 (9th Cir. 1958). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B) authorizes the appointment of 22 counsel at any stage of the proceeding for financially eligible persons if “the interests of justice 23 so require.” To determine whether to appoint counsel, the “court must evaluate the likelihood of 24 success on the merits as well as the ability of the petitioner to articulate his claims pro se in light 25 of the complexity of the legal issues involved.” Weygandt v. Look, 718 F.2d 952, 954 (9th Cir. 26 1983). 27 In the motion, Petitioner asserts that he is “limited in [his] legal constitutional kno[w]ledge and resources.” (ECF No. 6 at 2.) Upon review of the petition, the Court finds that 1 | Petitioner appears to have a sufficient grasp of his claims and the legal issues involved and that 2 | he is able to articulate those claims adequately. The legal issues involved are not extremely 3 | complex, and Petitioner does not demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits such that the 4 | interests of justice require the appointment of counsel at the present time. 5 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner’s motion for appointment of 6 | counsel (ECF No. 6) is DENIED. 7 IT IS SO ORDERED.
9! Dated: _August 7, 2023 [see hey 10 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
(HC) Drister v. Arviza ((HC) Drister v. Arviza) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.