(HC) Cloud v. Warden of CSP/Los Angeles County

District Court, E.D. California·Decided August 18, 2020·No. 1:20-cv-00904·Unknown

Opinion

JOEL JAMES CLOUD, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-00904-AWI-JLT (HC) ) Petitioner, ) ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO ) CHANGE NAME OF RESPONDENT v. ) ) CDCR/DIRECTOR, ) Respondent. ) ) )

On July 31, 2020, the Court dismissed the petition with leave to file a first amended petition for failure to name a proper respondent. (Doc. 15.) Petitioner filed a first amended petition on August 14, 2020, in which he names “Warden of CSP/Los Angeles County” as the Respondent. (Doc. 16 at 1.) Because it appears the Warden of CSP/Los Angeles County is a proper party (Rule 2(a) of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases; Ortiz-Sandoval v. Gomez, 81 F.3d 891, 894 (9th Cir. 1996); Stanley v. California Supreme Court, 21 F.3d 359, 360 (9th Cir. 1994)), the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to change the name of the Respondent to Warden of CSP/Los Angeles County.

Dated: August 18, 2020 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(HC) Cloud v. Warden of CSP/Los Angeles County, (E.D. Cal. 2020).

(HC) Cloud v. Warden of CSP/Los Angeles County ((HC) Cloud v. Warden of CSP/Los Angeles County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jerry F. Stanley v. California Supreme Court
21 F.3d 359 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)
Ortiz-Sandoval v. Gomez
81 F.3d 891 (Ninth Circuit, 1996)