(HC) Barnes v. Stone

Opinion

ANTOINE DESHAWN BARNES, No. 2:25-cv-0560 DJC CKD P Petitioner, v. ORDER Respondent. Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 31, 2025, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to Petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Petitioner has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The Magistrate Judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 31, 2025 are adopted in full; 2. Petitioner's third amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus is summarily dismissed; and 3. This case is closed. Dated: _May 23, 2025 “Darel J CL bratter— Hon. Daniel alabretta UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE