Hazzard v. Chase National Bank of City of New York

New York Court of Appeals

Hazzard v. Chase National Bank of City of New York

28 N.E.2d 406, 283 N.Y. 682, 1940 N.Y. LEXIS 1121

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 11, 1940

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 28 N.E.2d 406 (Hazzard v. Chase National Bank of City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hazzard v. Chase National Bank of City of New York, 28 N.E.2d 406, 283 N.Y. 682, 1940 N.Y. LEXIS 1121 (N.Y. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion for reargument or to amend remittitur. Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements, on the ground that it does not present either authority or reason for changing our decision that the liability of the corporate trustee though acting as a fiduciary was limited by the terms of the trust agreement. (Benton v. Safe Deposit Bank of Pottsville, 255 N. Y. 260.) Motion to amend the remittitur denied. (See 282 N. Y. 262.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for reargument or to amend remittitur. Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements, on the ground that it does not present either authority or reason for changing our decision that the liability of the corporate trustee though acting as a fiduciary was limited by the terms of the trust agreement. (Benton v. Safe Deposit Bank of Pottsville, 255 N. Y. 260.) Motion to amend the remittitur denied. (See 282 N. Y. 262.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

28 N.E.2d 406, 283 N.Y. 682, 1940 N.Y. LEXIS 1121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hazzard-v-chase-national-bank-of-city-of-new-york-ny-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack