Hazzard v. Chase National Bank of City of New York

28 N.E.2d 406, 283 N.Y. 682, 1940 N.Y. LEXIS 1121
New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 11, 1940·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Motion for reargument or to amend remittitur. Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements, on the ground that it does not present either authority or reason for changing our decision that the liability of the corporate trustee though acting as a fiduciary was limited by the terms of the trust agreement. (Benton v. Safe Deposit Bank of Pottsville, 255 N. Y. 260.) Motion to amend the remittitur denied. (See 282 N. Y. 262.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hazzard v. Chase National Bank of City of New York, 28 N.E.2d 406, 283 N.Y. 682, 1940 N.Y. LEXIS 1121 (N.Y. 1940).

28 N.E.2d 406 (Hazzard v. Chase National Bank of City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Groseclose v. Merchants National Bank & Trust Co.
71 Misc. 2d 111 (New York Supreme Court, 1972)