Hazouri v. Travelers Insurance Co.

192 So. 2d 296, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 4617
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 29, 1966
DocketNo. 65-795
StatusPublished

This text of 192 So. 2d 296 (Hazouri v. Travelers Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hazouri v. Travelers Insurance Co., 192 So. 2d 296, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 4617 (Fla. Ct. App. 1966).

Opinion

HENDRY, Chief Judge.

Elizabeth B. Hazouri sought a declaration that the Travelers Insurance Company was liable for medical expenses incurred by her after termination of her employment with the insurance company under “part EDMX — Major Medical Expense Benefits —Total Disability, Employees and their Dependents” of a group accident and sickness policy. The chancellor entered a final decree in favor of the insurance company.

Coverage under part EDMX is terminated when the employee’s employment is terminated unless such person is totally disabled at the date he ceases active work.

The evidence reveals that Mrs. Hazouri had been hospitalized from August 9, 1963, to August 11, 1963, due to an emotional disturbance. On August 12, 1963, she returned to her usual and regular employment with the insurance company in Miami on a full time 'basis. She continued working full time until she voluntarily terminated her employment on October 4, 1963. Mrs. Haz-ouri gave as her reason for resigning that she was going to Jacksonville to take care of her sick child. A short time after her arrival in Jacksonville she was hospitalized for approximately three weeks. She has [297]*297Ea’d psychiatric- care, both in and out of the hospital, since that time.

Whether one is totally disabled depends upon the circumstances of the particular case and is ordinarily a question of fact.1

The evidence in this case is sufficient to warrant a finding that Mrs. Hazouri was not totally disabled at the time she terminated her employment.2

Therefore, the decree appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. Wiggins
155 So. 327 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1934)
Scott v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.
158 So. 2d 532 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
192 So. 2d 296, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 4617, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hazouri-v-travelers-insurance-co-fladistctapp-1966.