Hazouri ex rel. Hazouri v. Maillet

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hazouri ex rel. Hazouri v. Maillet

276 So. 2d 70, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6850

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 8, 1973

DocketNo. R-53

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 276 So. 2d 70 (Hazouri ex rel. Hazouri v. Maillet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hazouri ex rel. Hazouri v. Maillet, 276 So. 2d 70, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6850 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioners seek a writ of common law certiorari from an order granting respondent, Peninsular Fire Insurance Company, a separate trial from that of respondent, Jeffrey Maillet.

Certiorari is a discretionary writ issued only where the trial court acts without or in excess of jurisdiction, or where an interlocutory order does not conform to the essential requirements of law and may reasonably cause material injury that cannot be corrected by the remedy of appeal. When the alleged error is procedural, as in this case, the petitioner must demonstrate that the error is fundamental error. Nonfundamental errors of procedure cannot be the subject of a proceeding for writ of certiorari even though the error might be reversible on appeal. We do not feel that the error alleged here is fundamental error or that the trial court’s order will cause petitioner material injury. Gulf Cities Gas Corporation v. Cihak, 201 So.2d 250 (2 Fla.App.1967).

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied without prejudice to petitioners’ raising the issue upon appeal from final judgment,

SPECTOR, C. J., and RAWLS and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Petitioners seek a writ of common law certiorari from an order granting respondent, Peninsular Fire Insurance Company, a separate trial from that of respondent, Jeffrey Maillet.

Certiorari is a discretionary writ issued only where the trial court acts without or in excess of jurisdiction, or where an interlocutory order does not conform to the essential requirements of law and may reasonably cause material injury that cannot be corrected by the remedy of appeal. When the alleged error is procedural, as in this case, the petitioner must demonstrate that the error is fundamental error. Nonfundamental errors of procedure cannot be the subject of a proceeding for writ of certiorari even though the error might be reversible on appeal. We do not feel that the error alleged here is fundamental error or that the trial court’s order will cause petitioner material injury. Gulf Cities Gas Corporation v. Cihak, 201 So.2d 250 (2 Fla.App.1967).

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied without prejudice to petitioners’ raising the issue upon appeal from final judgment,

SPECTOR, C. J., and RAWLS and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

276 So. 2d 70, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6850, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hazouri-ex-rel-hazouri-v-maillet-fladistctapp-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack