Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Hazley v. State

Hazley v. State

860 So. 2d 1001, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 16519, 2003 WL 22458899
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 31, 2003
DocketNo. 5D03-3098
StatusPublished

This text of 860 So. 2d 1001 (Hazley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hazley v. State, 860 So. 2d 1001, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 16519, 2003 WL 22458899 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of the appellant’s rule 3.800(a) motion to correct an illegal sentence pursuant to Hersey v. State, 831 So.2d 679 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002). We certify conflict with Green v. State, 839 So.2d 748 (Fla. 2d DCA), review granted, Franklin v. State, Nos. SC03-413, SC03-532, 854 So.2d 659 (Fla. Sept. 19, 2003) (consolidating the appeals in Green and State v. Franklin, 836 So.2d 1112 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003), to review interdistrict conflict).

AFFIRMED; CONFLICT CERTIFIED.

SHARP, W: and PLEUS, JJ., concur. SAWAYA, C.J., concurs and concurs specially, with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fillyaw v. State
853 So. 2d 590 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Pena v. State
853 So. 2d 1120 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Green v. State
839 So. 2d 748 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Hersey v. State
831 So. 2d 679 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
State v. Franklin
836 So. 2d 1112 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
860 So. 2d 1001, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 16519, 2003 WL 22458899, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hazley-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.