Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Hazley v. State

Hazley v. State

860 So. 2d 1001, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 16519, 2003 WL 22458899
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 31, 2003·No. No. 5D03-3098·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of the appellant’s rule 3.800(a) motion to correct an illegal sentence pursuant to Hersey v. State, 831 So.2d 679 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002). We certify conflict with Green v. State, 839 So.2d 748 (Fla. 2d DCA), review granted, Franklin v. State, Nos. SC03-413, SC03-532, 854 So.2d 659 (Fla. Sept. 19, 2003) (consolidating the appeals in Green and State v. Franklin, 836 So.2d 1112 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003), to review interdistrict conflict).

AFFIRMED; CONFLICT CERTIFIED.

SHARP, W: and PLEUS, JJ., concur. SAWAYA, C.J., concurs and concurs specially, with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hazley v. State, 860 So. 2d 1001, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 16519, 2003 WL 22458899 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

860 So. 2d 1001 (Hazley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fillyaw v. State
853 So. 2d 590 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Pena v. State
853 So. 2d 1120 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Green v. State
839 So. 2d 748 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Hersey v. State
831 So. 2d 679 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
State v. Franklin
836 So. 2d 1112 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)