Hazlehurst v. United States

Supreme Court

Hazlehurst v. United States

4 U.S. 6

DecidedAugust 15, 1799

StatusPublished

This text of 4 U.S. 6 (Hazlehurst v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hazlehurst v. United States, 4 U.S. 6 (1799).

Pincite

Opinion

In error from the Circuit Court for the district of South Carolina. A rule had been obtained by Lee, the Attorney-General, at the opening of the court, that the plaintiffs appear and prosecute their writ of error within the term, or suffer a nonpros.: but it was found, that errors had been assigned in the court below, and *a joinder in error entered here. The rule was, therefore, changed to the following : “ that unless the plaintiffs in.error appear and argue the errors to-morrow, a non-pros, be entered.” The plaintiffs not appearing, the writ of error was non-prossed, according to the rule. 7]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In error from the Circuit Court for the district of South Carolina. A rule had been obtained by Lee, the Attorney-General, at the opening of the court, that the plaintiffs appear and prosecute their writ of error within the term, or suffer a nonpros.: but it was found, that errors had been assigned in the court below, and *a joinder in error entered here. The rule was, therefore, changed to the following : “ that unless the plaintiffs in.error appear and argue the errors to-morrow, a non-pros, be entered.” The plaintiffs not appearing, the writ of error was non-prossed, according to the rule. 7]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 U.S. 6, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hazlehurst-v-united-states-scotus-1799.